Thursday, October 1, 2009

no grass is greener

A recent article in my local newspaper described efforts to create a new strain of grass that can grow with less water and still form the kind of lawns that we are accustomed to being a part of our landscapes. On the one hand, this is an admirable endeavor, but on the other, are we so conditioned to believe that landscapes must include expanses of grass in the first place?

Now I am not against beautiful lawns full of grass per se; they are an important component of many sports arenas certainly, and make for important grounds for gathering in public places such as parks. They are wonderful for running on when playing and exercising. They should be looked at as special. But in this country at least, they are looked on by most as the primary building block of the typical landscape. I can imagine when our country was mostly wilderness, how an isolated landscape was looked upon as an escape where plants were chosen for the reminder they might provide of another place and time, the old country, for example. But now, with an ever growing population taking over more and more of the land, landscaping needs a new paradigm by putting emphasis on the old.

My point may have its origins in extolling the virtues of the near-elimination of grass-centric landscapes, but my greater argument is for the use of native plants. Whether you live in the mid-West, in which case you should consider plants native to the mid-West, or the Southeast (consider using the plants of the Southeast!), the plants that have evolved in your region will grow naturally with those conditions, be they the unique conditions of the soil, the precipitation, the amount of sunlight, and even in concert with the particular fauna of that region. By doing so, you would naturally use less supplemental water and maybe eliminate the use of fertilizers and pesticides altogether!

Back when our country was young and being settled, a single specimen of a particular tree with an exotic shape and colors may have stood out in an entire wilderness, but look at the typical suburb and these exotic trees are everywhere. In many cases, they multiply without check and crowd out the native trees. These native trees are the ones that our native fauna have evolved with for thousands of years! And back to the ubiquitous grass and lawns: how much harm is being done to keep them lush and 'cared-for'? Chemicals? Gas or electric lawnmowers? Precious water??

It's not so much adding yet another thing to worry about and take up increasingly rare time - those with landscapes to care for may well eventually end up with more time on their hands. Imagine recomposing your land such that you can spend that much less time tending to it. Replacing your lawn means not having to take care of it anymore. Well chosen native plants and shrubs means less water and pruning. And more birds and bees!

2 comments:

  1. Hi Arthur,

    You should send this into the local newspapers. See if they will print it.

    Anthony

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Anthony! I should look into it.

    Arthur

    ReplyDelete