Congratulations to Mark Buehrle of the Chicago White Sox for his perfect game!! 27 up and 27 down. And the catch by DeWayne Wise to preserve it was spectacular.
What I don't understand is how a fielding error cost Jonathan Sanchez of the San Francisco Giants a perfect game less than two weeks before. Sanchez issued no walks and didn't hit a batter. He pitched a perfect game as well. Only a tough chance error relegated him to pitching a no-hitter, an incredible accomplishment to be sure, but not perfection. I realize that a perfect game is defined as facing the minimum number of batters, but for all intents and purposes, I don't think that Buehrle's and Sanchez's accomplishments were any different. And now the record books will show one as greater than the other, a perfect game vs. a no-hitter.
If the only blemish to a perfect game happens in the field, then why can't it be called a perfect game too? In Sanchez's case, call it a perfect game, and if more information is necessary, a 28-batter perfect game. For Buehrle, a 27-batter perfect game. But call them both perfect games. To call Sanchez's game simply a no-hitter is to make it sound no different than a no-hitter that included five walks and a hit batter.
And not just for the game that Sanchez pitched, but for all the no-hitters that were perfect except for defensive errors - they deserve to be called perfect games too. And it will take some fielders off the hook.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment